On Thursday, I went to an extremely fascinating, inspiring, and empowering side event about supporting the implementation of the Paris Agreement through climate litigation and legislative reforms. The panel featured speakers involved in several prominent lawsuits and organizations that work to hold both governments and corporations accountable in court.
One of the panelists, involved with the Urgenda Foundation and litigation in the Netherlands, emphasized the broader strategic advantages of using the court system as a tool to combat climate change. Beyond the actual financial compensation that plaintiffs (those who are suing) receive, the panelist discussed how courts help to hold governments accountable because government cannot lie in court or suppress information as they may be able to in other spheres, such as with the media. Bringing a case to court also humanizes and helps to communicate the impacts of the climate crisis by centering the stories and experiences of those who are affected. Furthermore, litigation can serve as a catalyst for other individuals and social movements by legitimizing their demands.
With respect to specific cases, the panel also had representation from several lawsuits pushing governments to ratchet up their emissions reduction targets and expedite their timelines, and corporations to take responsibility for how their actions have fueled the climate crisis and provide compensation to those affected. The main arguments in some of these suits include unlawful interference with property due to flooding from climate change-induced glacial melting (the Huaraz case), and detrimental impacts to the indigenous Sami people in Sweden, whose livelihoods (reindeer herding) and culture are being threatened by declining reindeer populations as a result of climate stressors.
I was really inspired by this event because I am planning to pursue a career in environmental protection, civil rights, and indigenous rights law, and am very interested in how I can incorporate climate change and these claims in the legal work that I will do. While this event was extremely interesting and inspiring, it was also very Eurocentric. I am therefore curious about the implications and effectiveness of this legal approach in countries where the political will necessary to enact this kind of change through the court system may not exist.
— Shana
Really interesting, Shana – thanks for reporting on it. There’s some similar recent history in the U.S., though largely (completely?) unsuccessful in recent, climate-change-specific lawsuits. However, one big legal victory a bit farther back was Massachusetts vs. EPA (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massachusetts_v._Environmental_Protection_Agency) which forced the EPA to regulate CO2 as a pollutant.
Hi Eric — thanks for your comment! I do recall learning about Massachusetts vs. EPA in Environmental Policy & Politics with Professor Nackenoff! It is such a fascinating and revolutionary case, and I hope to see more victories in the future! I know that some youth-led litigation is currently underway, but I am not sure where it stands as of now, and unfortunately, it will likely be many years before a decision is reached. I am looking forward to following this case and any others that may emerge!