{"id":1019,"date":"2012-11-01T13:04:37","date_gmt":"2012-11-01T13:04:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.swarthmore.edu\/institutional-research\/?p=1019"},"modified":"2023-09-13T15:41:14","modified_gmt":"2023-09-13T15:41:14","slug":"optimal-faculty-to-staff-ratio","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.swarthmore.edu\/institutional-research\/?p=1019","title":{"rendered":"&#8220;Optimal&#8221; Faculty to Staff Ratio"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>An <a href=\"http:\/\/chronicle.com\/article\/Ideal-Ratio-of-Tenure-Track\/135500\/?cid=at\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">article<\/a> in the Chronicle today reports on a <a href=\"http:\/\/papers.ssrn.com\/sol3\/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2153122\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">study<\/a> by two economists about the optimal faculty to staff ratio.\u00a0 The study is focused on Research 1 and 2 public institutions, but I couldn&#8217;t stop myself from applying the simple math formula to a small liberal arts college, such as Swarthmore, to see what would happen.<\/p>\n<p>We are actually <a title=\"\u201cFreeze\u201d time\" href=\"https:\/\/blogs.swarthmore.edu\/institutional-research\/?p=160\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">freezing<\/a> our employee data today, and so I don&#8217;t yet have current numbers, but based on last year&#8217;s data we had 944 employees &#8211; 699 full-time.\u00a0 The study identifies the optimal ratio as 3 tenure-tack faculty to each full-time professional administrator.\u00a0 Using <a title=\"The Importance of IPEDS\" href=\"https:\/\/blogs.swarthmore.edu\/institutional-research\/?p=972\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">IPEDS <\/a>reporting definitions, we had 162 tenured and on-track faculty members last year, and 242 full-time professional administrators (Executive\/ Administrative\/ Managerial, and Other Professional). \u00a0 That&#8217;s a conservative estimate of &#8220;professional administrators,&#8221; because it&#8217;s unclear to me from the paper which categories are included in the final equation. \u00a0 All non-faculty staff are considered at different points in their modeling.<\/p>\n<p>So if that 3 to 1 ratio were desirable here, we would need to add 564 tenure-track faculty. \u00a0 I don&#8217;t know how the 242 administrators would manage all the new buildings and infrastructure we&#8217;d need. \u00a0 And our student to faculty ratio would drop to about 2:1. \u00a0 Alternately, we could get rid of about 188 professional administrators to drop their total to 54. \u00a0 In that case our 162 faculty would have to start managing housing, administering grants, raising funds, supporting IT, doing IPEDS reporting, etc., in addition to all their regular responsibilities.\u00a0 I&#8217;m sure they&#8217;d enjoy that.<\/p>\n<p>Guess I&#8217;ll just have to wait until these researchers tackle this issue for liberal arts colleges.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>An article in the Chronicle today reports on a study by two economists about the optimal faculty to staff ratio.\u00a0 The study is focused on Research 1 and 2 public institutions, but I couldn&#8217;t stop myself from applying the simple math formula to a small liberal arts college, such as Swarthmore, to see what would &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.swarthmore.edu\/institutional-research\/?p=1019\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">&#8220;Optimal&#8221; Faculty to Staff Ratio<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[15,3],"tags":[28,27,26,29],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.swarthmore.edu\/institutional-research\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1019"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.swarthmore.edu\/institutional-research\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.swarthmore.edu\/institutional-research\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.swarthmore.edu\/institutional-research\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.swarthmore.edu\/institutional-research\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1019"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.swarthmore.edu\/institutional-research\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1019\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1555,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.swarthmore.edu\/institutional-research\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1019\/revisions\/1555"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.swarthmore.edu\/institutional-research\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1019"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.swarthmore.edu\/institutional-research\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1019"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.swarthmore.edu\/institutional-research\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1019"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}