I don’t think there is any reason why what you have written here and what i wrote there are in conflict. I think that one can reject the notion that there is a crisis or a severe lack that necessitates a radical rethink of pedagogical goals and methods while accepting that a professor/department/school can and should be continually reassessing such things. I would argue (and presume that you would agree) that continual reassessment would take away the need for radical shifts in the future. I also think this needs to happen through faculty and not administration. Though I am skeptical that it would get the disrupters off our back since I am not convinced they care much about education and the liberal arts to begin with.