Comments on: Reading the Not-Yet https://blogs.swarthmore.edu/burke/blog/2010/01/13/reading-the-not-yet/ Culture, Politics, Academia and Other Shiny Objects Fri, 15 Jan 2010 20:47:28 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.4.15 By: Timothy Burke https://blogs.swarthmore.edu/burke/blog/2010/01/13/reading-the-not-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-7067 Fri, 15 Jan 2010 20:47:28 +0000 http://weblogs.swarthmore.edu/burke/?p=1111#comment-7067 Though it’s a very good formalization of this point, to not imagine that somehow Torah anticipates and is always already part of Talmud.

]]> By: NadavT https://blogs.swarthmore.edu/burke/blog/2010/01/13/reading-the-not-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-7066 Fri, 15 Jan 2010 20:38:32 +0000 http://weblogs.swarthmore.edu/burke/?p=1111#comment-7066 “that the later authors are responding as much to a lineage of successive interpretations as they are to the foundation.”

There’s nothing so unusual about that — sounds just like the Rabbinical tradition! Of course, now that’s introducing an entirely different field of study.

]]> By: David Chudzicki https://blogs.swarthmore.edu/burke/blog/2010/01/13/reading-the-not-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-7061 Wed, 13 Jan 2010 19:47:43 +0000 http://weblogs.swarthmore.edu/burke/?p=1111#comment-7061 It’s just so tempting to make my students read Newton… Hmm, really, the math is so dry that giving history more emphasis than I do would probably be a really good thing. I think it’s easier in my field to make the “lineage of successive interpretations” not so unsettling.

]]>