Comments on: Simplicity vs. Sustainability https://blogs.swarthmore.edu/burke/blog/2009/09/24/simplicity-vs-sustainability/ Culture, Politics, Academia and Other Shiny Objects Mon, 05 Oct 2009 15:03:34 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.4.15 By: Timothy Burke https://blogs.swarthmore.edu/burke/blog/2009/09/24/simplicity-vs-sustainability/comment-page-1/#comment-6867 Mon, 05 Oct 2009 15:03:34 +0000 http://weblogs.swarthmore.edu/burke/?p=993#comment-6867 I hear you. Definitely a good deal of the sustainability literature tries very hard to define the concept closer to my emotional feeling about simplicity in this post, as well as tries to keep it close to that sense of money in, expenditures out. But I really do feel there’s a maximalist tendency in some sustainability activism, as well as a tendency to actually complicate the work of everyday life. If I need to march all over the place just to make consistently sustainable choices, then that is in and of itself not especially sustainable (either in the sense of conserving personal energies or in the sense of making inputs and outputs align).

]]>
By: Stentor https://blogs.swarthmore.edu/burke/blog/2009/09/24/simplicity-vs-sustainability/comment-page-1/#comment-6863 Sun, 04 Oct 2009 19:42:52 +0000 http://weblogs.swarthmore.edu/burke/?p=993#comment-6863 This is interesting, because — perhaps due to spending my days immersed in that sustainability literature — I have the opposite valence to my reactions to those two words. For me, “sustainability” connotes attention to the goals of an enterprise and concern for how you’re affecting others or your own future (which I suppose is not too far off from your conception, though I interpret “sustainability” as being much more “good enough” than some other, more maximalist ways of thinking). Whereas “simplicity” to me sounds like fetishizing one means to sustainability, and in that sense much more limiting.

]]>
By: Timothy Burke https://blogs.swarthmore.edu/burke/blog/2009/09/24/simplicity-vs-sustainability/comment-page-1/#comment-6845 Thu, 01 Oct 2009 00:25:49 +0000 http://weblogs.swarthmore.edu/burke/?p=993#comment-6845 See, I somewhat obviously am wary of that. Simplicity is a shared cultural property, so it needs talking out, and that can sometimes verge on a regulatory experience. But the idea that it need enforcement would be, as often, a place where we split and you go vaguely communitarian and I go vaguely libertarian.

]]>
By: Russell Arben Fox https://blogs.swarthmore.edu/burke/blog/2009/09/24/simplicity-vs-sustainability/comment-page-1/#comment-6844 Wed, 30 Sep 2009 21:42:18 +0000 http://weblogs.swarthmore.edu/burke/?p=993#comment-6844 Heh. You know me too well, David. I was just thinking of sending Tim an article I’ve written on simplicity and bicycling. It’s thesis is that “keeping it simple” actually sometimes does involve “creating elaborate regulations or structures or standards which then need to be recited or enforced at every turn.”

]]>
By: Western Dave https://blogs.swarthmore.edu/burke/blog/2009/09/24/simplicity-vs-sustainability/comment-page-1/#comment-6842 Mon, 28 Sep 2009 02:37:50 +0000 http://weblogs.swarthmore.edu/burke/?p=993#comment-6842 Russell is going to love this.

]]>