Comments on: Look With Care at the Shape of the Square https://blogs.swarthmore.edu/burke/blog/2007/07/23/look-with-care-at-the-shape-of-the-square/ Culture, Politics, Academia and Other Shiny Objects Fri, 27 Jul 2007 04:31:42 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.4.15 By: joe o https://blogs.swarthmore.edu/burke/blog/2007/07/23/look-with-care-at-the-shape-of-the-square/comment-page-1/#comment-3912 Fri, 27 Jul 2007 04:31:42 +0000 http://weblogs.swarthmore.edu/burke/?p=405#comment-3912 Page 239 of “maps of time” states that the houses in permanent villages “usually” were square or rectangular and then mentions well-built round houses of northern china as being an exception.

]]>
By: Timothy Burke https://blogs.swarthmore.edu/burke/blog/2007/07/23/look-with-care-at-the-shape-of-the-square/comment-page-1/#comment-3871 Tue, 24 Jul 2007 12:56:18 +0000 http://weblogs.swarthmore.edu/burke/?p=405#comment-3871 Yeah, that’s one of the key examples I’m thinking of, Preachy. The square v. round issue in Roman Britain strikes me as being a matter of culture, rather than a matter of agricuculture.

]]>
By: PreachyPreach https://blogs.swarthmore.edu/burke/blog/2007/07/23/look-with-care-at-the-shape-of-the-square/comment-page-1/#comment-3868 Tue, 24 Jul 2007 07:33:22 +0000 http://weblogs.swarthmore.edu/burke/?p=405#comment-3868 that sedentary and early agricultural villages everywhere can be identified in part by the fact that the houses they build are square

Like, um, all the roundhouses in pre-Roman Britain. Oh.

]]>
By: Timothy Burke https://blogs.swarthmore.edu/burke/blog/2007/07/23/look-with-care-at-the-shape-of-the-square/comment-page-1/#comment-3850 Mon, 23 Jul 2007 20:37:45 +0000 http://weblogs.swarthmore.edu/burke/?p=405#comment-3850 Sure, but you can build more permanent round houses, and some cultures have. The association with timber is a good one. I just thought that Christian was suggesting that somehow settled cultures inevitably build square houses because they’re intrinsically better for settled or agricultural societies. But mrscoulter’s suggestion is probably right–he was more saying that a square house is evidence of a settled culture, whereas a round house could be either.

]]>
By: Jonathan Dresner https://blogs.swarthmore.edu/burke/blog/2007/07/23/look-with-care-at-the-shape-of-the-square/comment-page-1/#comment-3849 Mon, 23 Jul 2007 20:34:00 +0000 http://weblogs.swarthmore.edu/burke/?p=405#comment-3849 Just a guess, but I’d suspect that square houses are a function of building with heavy timber (or sod, come to think of it, works better in lines, too), whereas the kind of light poles and canvas constructions of migratory people are more efficiently and quickly built in the round.

]]>
By: Timothy Burke https://blogs.swarthmore.edu/burke/blog/2007/07/23/look-with-care-at-the-shape-of-the-square/comment-page-1/#comment-3842 Mon, 23 Jul 2007 15:45:59 +0000 http://weblogs.swarthmore.edu/burke/?p=405#comment-3842 Oh, maybe that is what he means. That seems pretty fair. I read it as, “If you’re agricultural or sedentary, you’ll build square houses”.

]]>
By: mrscoulter https://blogs.swarthmore.edu/burke/blog/2007/07/23/look-with-care-at-the-shape-of-the-square/comment-page-1/#comment-3841 Mon, 23 Jul 2007 15:44:39 +0000 http://weblogs.swarthmore.edu/burke/?p=405#comment-3841 Hmmmm…

Could it be that what he means to say is that if you find square houses, you know it was agricultural? Not that all agricultural societies build square houses, but rather that nomadic societies DON’T…

So if you find square houses, you can be fairly confident that you’re dealing with an agricultural society. Round houses, on the other hand, could be either nomadic or agricultural.

No idea, of course, whether *this* claim is valid either.

]]>