Archive for May, 2010

Obama’s Vision for a 21st Century Border: What is at stake?

Friday, May 21st, 2010

The vision for a 21st century border revolves around creating an environment in which people, objects, and information that are legally mandated can flow freely while illegal crossings are prevented. On the one hand, it promised to provide the infrastructure and technologies to ensure efficient and safe border crossings. This issue is particularly important to South Texans since retail sales have sharply dropped due mainly to Mexican residents having a harder time crossing the border and shopping. The plan for the 21st Century Border is vague on how border crossings will be made more efficient (see excerpt from press release below). The language suggests better integration of data across all sectors of law enforcement and perhaps, though not stated directly, the use of biometric identification cards. The Vision also suggests the use of better technologies to secure the border and prevent illegal crossings. Again, it is vague as to how this technological shift will be accomplished. Does this mean more unmanned drones? What about the failures of virtual fencing? As in most security discussions, actors hold the promise of new technologies high as a way to resolve our security needs while respecting civil rights.

On a more positive note, the Vision calls for consultation with local stakeholders and government officials. One can hope that these consultations will be wide-ranging and that border security decisions will be made with respect for human rights.

One issue remains: while the federal government introduces new technologies, drug cartels and others involved in illegal activities will search for ways to thwart these security measures. Are we more densely interlocking ourselves in a spiral that will lead to more violence and militarization? Are new technologies always the most humane and effective solution?

Below is a partial description of the system from DHSs’ website:
“The result will be a future state in which cross-border travel and in-country immigration activities are simple and convenient for eligible, low-risk persons, and virtually impossible for those who seek to do harm or violate U.S. laws. It will be a state in which decision-makers have complete access to the information they need, when and where they need it, to make the best, most informed decision every time. It will be an environment where technology is used to address the challenges posed by volume, speed, and distance and where best practices from across the Government and private sector are shared and leveraged.
The future will be an environment in which all parties – federal, state, local, and foreign governments as well as the private sector – coordinate, cooperate and collaborate to achieve the immigration and border management mission. These improvements will enhance the integrity of our immigration system and scrupulously protect the privacy and civil liberties of U.S. citizens and foreign visitors.”

http://www.dhs.gov/xnews/releases/press_release_0603.sht

Testimony at Texas House Select Committee on Emergency Preparedness and Border Security

Wednesday, May 19th, 2010

Texas State Representative Aaron Pena (http://www.acapitolblog.com/) presided over a hearing on emergency preparedness that united discussion on topics such as disaster relief, drug smuggling and violence, and the Gulf oil spill. Among the highlights of presentations on border security.
–To what extent should we be concentrating on the interdiction of firearms and cash heading to Mexico. How can that be done more effectively?
–What progress has local law enforcement made in establishing a regional authority to handle a major crisis? On this front local law enforcement following other models in Texas is now beginning to engage in talks to establish a regional authority. Rep. Pena expressed strong support of this effort.
–To what extent do roads need to be widened and infrastructure expanded to handle a large-scale evacuation? In the case of a major hurricane or other emergency one might imagine the need for a large-scale evacuation from Mexico to the US. Testimony indicated that many of the highways off of border crossings could not handle a large-scale evacuation.
–Business leaders expressed concern about the decline in retail sales that have resulted from longer lines at border crossings.

Miguel Diaz-Barriga and Margaret Dorsey presented the findings of their survey research at the hearings. Rep. Aaron started his introduction by giving a very nice plug for Dorsey’s book, Pachangas. Our presentation emphasized that Hidalgo County residents opposition to the border wall should not be interpreted as a lack of concern about border security. Our research shows uneven support for virtual fencing and strong support for more border patrol agents. We are now in the process of analyzing this data and through follow-up interviews more closely analyze these perspectives. Our data also shows that strong supporters of the border wall, for which there are  few, favored the wall because they thought it would stop crime. Opponents viewed the wall as a waste of money that would not be effective at stopping either crime or illegal immigration.

Chad Richardson, Professor of Sociology at the University of Texas Pan American, talked about how cartel control of drug smuggling has now meant complete control of activities along the border including undocumented immigration. On a different note, he also pointed out that his data shows that Mexican shoppers are concerned about the long lines at border crossings. Any measure that would now require security checks for traffic into Mexico would have to consider how to do this effectively and quickly to avoid delays.  Such delays would discourage shoppers and others engaged in legal activities from crossing the border.

http://www.themonitor.com/news/spill-38715-mcallen-bodytext.html