Archive for the ‘immigration’ Category

The Dream Act in South Texas

Wednesday, February 2nd, 2011

Dream Act Threat

While demonstrations for passing the Dream Act have, on many campuses, attracted large numbers of supporters protests in South Texas have been relatively small.  The University of Texas Pan American, according to activists, has over 600 students who are undocumented yet protests at the University have only attracted a handful of students and faculty.  In fact, community members have harassed supporters of the Dream Act.  The reasons for the lack of protests, I think, do not represent indifference to passage of the Dream Act. Yet it is difficult to pinpoint the reasons for the lack of open and public support of the dream act.  Do harassment and death threats play a role? Consider the following story printed on the Channel 4 website.

http://www.valleycentral.com/news/story.aspx?id=554210&sms_ss=facebook&at_xt=4d49738af721f26b%2C0

Regardless of numerous threats and assaults, a student at UTPA continues to push the controversial Dream Act so that he and 601 other fellow students at UTPA can be on the path to citizenship.

Jose Alejandro Garrido has been very outspoken about the Dream Act, and his participation in rallies have gotten him in trouble.

“He just punched me…right there,” said Garrido. “He approached me and he said, ‘hey, are you one of those advocates for those illegals?’”

Garrido said he was shopping at Wal-Mart when he was asked this question, and when he said yes, he was punched.

“I knew I should know better as long as somebody uses the word illegals, they are racist because no human being is illegal,” said Garrido.

He said he’s also gotten numerous threatening calls and emails, but regardless, he continues to fight for the Dream Act because he himself is a dreamer.

“I use to live under so much fear in the past and now i realize it’s not my fault, said Garrido. “It wasn’t my fault to come here. My parents brought me here.”

Garrido came to the United States from Veracruz when he was 13 years old, and this Saturday, he’ll be graduating from UTPA.

His goal is to continue on to law school and become a civil rights attorney, but if the Dream Act doesn’t pass, his future is uncertain.

“I pretty much live in a legal limbo because of the actions of my parents,” said Garrido.

Its stories like this that moved Brian Silva to help start the Coalition for Educational Opportunity.

He along with Garrido and several other students started the organization to push for the Dream Act by hosting rallies and a hunger strike.

At one of their rallies here at the Chapel Lawn, the student activists released 602 balloons symbolizing those dreamers that are here at UTPA.

Silva said he fights for the 602 UTPA undocumented immigrant students, or “dreamers” as some call them, because they have a lot to offer society.

“(They have) this enormous capacity to contribute to American society, but they can’t do anything more because they can’t practice their degrees,” said Silva.

Garrido and Silva said they hope the Senate has been moved by the dreamers’ stories and will approve the dream act.

Elite Mexicans in South Texas

Tuesday, January 25th, 2011

In South Texas residents use the term “nationals” to refer to elite Mexicans while the rest of the population is known as mexicanos or Mexicans (middle or working class).  The City of McAllen is now seeking to become a regional center for granting EB-5 visas, the investor visa, granted to those who invest at least $500,000 in a business or enterprise.  Wealthy mexicans fleeing the drug violence have increasingly sought these visas.  According to the McAllen chamber of commerce applications for these visas over the last two years has increased from 3 to 5 per month to 5 to 8 per week.  In an article published in the McAllen Monitor I discuss the cultural complexities of elite Mexicans living in the valley in terms of the negative stereotypes that circulate not only about Mexican immigration but also wealthy Mexicans.  The comments to the article are telling.  I have posted three below. 

publicadvisor ”Permanent residency, or a green card, is available to foreign nationals and their family members who invest at least $500,000 in the United States, Patridge said. “Money buys you anything in America! ” Thats what he said! That’s what it is! Like any currupt country in the world! Proud to be American!

paradoxvigilante  4:37 PM on January 5, 2011 whatever it’s because “mexicans” are the new scapegoats for all this country’s problems. Next thing you know some loon will say they are connected to 9/11 

machogabcho  8:41 PM on January 5, 2011 @paradoxvigilante–I don’t know of anyone in this country who’s making Mexicans “scapegoats” but I can provide links to where Mexican politicians are making Americans “scapegoats” for the problems in their country. And as for the “connected to 9/11″ theory, Mexicans have murdered a hell of a lot more Americans than the 9/11 hijackers .

  esminombre 7:50 AM on January 5, 2011 There are so many illegal aliens living (not working) in the US that probably contribute nothing to our economy. This new wave of people have the means to get into Texas legally (just go to La Plaza) why not embrace their half million contribution and consider putting 10 people to work is not a great idea? Everyone here seems to agree that these foreigners should go through legal channels to live here. Give these Mexicans a chance. We need the jobs and their money. This is a golden opportunity and I think you will see banks, real estate companies and many others lining up to form partnerships with these new millionaires. Milborne Drysdale’s will step up to bat any day.

We have too many “loosers” on this site.

The Chicano Movement Trail Becomes Another Stop in Texas’ Forgotten History of Internment Camps/Detention Centers

Thursday, January 14th, 2010

IMG_4090

Did you hear that the Texas School Board is considering dropping Cesar Chavez and Irma Rangel from Texas history books?  Chavez and Rangel are the only two “Hispanics” mentioned in Texas history books after the 1600′s (see http://action.ufw.org/page/speakout/cectxjan10).  After our visit to Crystal City and Marfa, we were not very surprised.

For Winter Break, Margaret and Miguel planned a trip to West Texas to visit the border wall in various places as well as interview local residents about their opinion of the border wall/fence.  Along the way, which is a long one, we also wanted to stop by a few places that are historically significant and where we have never been, including Crystal City.   These stops were also part of our larger mission of starting a Chicano/a Movement Trail based out of South Texas.  Many scholars know Crystal City as point of charge (pas du charge) for the Chicano/a Movement as well as the birthplace of The Raza Unida Party in 1970.  Crystal City is where Chicano/a activists took over the town council–all White since 1910–and Raza Unida held power for approximately a decade.  (Below we will include a description of the Chicano Revolts written by Teresa Acosta for the Handbook of Texas Online.)

Miguel and Margaret were excited to visit this historic place, particularly because we are two enthusiasts of social movements.  Our enthusiasm quickly waned as we drove into Crystal City and saw little indication of Raza Unida and many signs of the city’s militarized history.  As we drove around town, we spotted the local library.  We went inside and asked the librarian about historical markers relating to political activity and change in the region, particularly in the 1960′s and 1970′s.  The librarian said that there was nothing that she knew of but said that we could visit the site of the World War II era internment camps as well as purchase a book about them for $10.  We bought the book, and she gave us directions.  We passed the former site about four times before seeing the historical marker in a field.

IMG_4092

From the historical marker, we learned that Crystal City housed one of the largest German and Japanese American Internment Camps in the United States, from 1941-48.  The book we purchased in the library Vanished:  German-American Internment, 1941-48 (Luick-Thrams 2005) describes in harrowing detail the experiences of German-American “enemy aliens” during this time.  Did you know that the United States imprisoned in these centers not only U.S. citizens but also Germans and Austrians from all over North and South America?  One of the most harrowing stories tells of a German-American family “exchanged” toward the end of the war for U.S. soldiers.  Three members of the family were U.S. citizens.  Essentially, the U.S. government exchanged U.S. citizens for U.S. citizens.  Ensila Eiserloh Bennett tells the story of the Eiserloh family’s forced repatriation in Vanished.  In this story, the Eiserloh mother gives birth while in passage to Germany.

IMG_4095

At the site of the internment camps, now the site of Crystal City’s public schools, one can see little trace of this vast family imprisonment compound, except for a few concrete slab foundations remaining.  For us, Crystal City marks another site in Texas where a successful effort has been made to erase our history thus deleting people’s rights as well as the histories of powerful movements.  To return to our opening comment regarding Texas history textbooks, why are Texas’ children not reading and visiting the sites in Texas of our internment (and Texas’ citizens complicity in this process) of U.S. citizens?  Literally, today, we see the schoolboard proactively trying to erase, once again, signs of political action that don’t fit into the traditional Alamo and Davy Crocket story.  Why are there no historical markers commemorating the Chicano/a movement in Crystal City and the breakdown of segregation?

IMG_4097

Acosta’s write-up about the “Crystal City Revolts:”

CRYSTAL CITY REVOLTS. In 1963 and again in 1969, Mexican Americans in Crystal City organized against Caucasian domination of city hall and the public school system. The result was an electoral victory for Hispanic Texans for the first time since the city’s incorporation in 1910.

The 1963 movement was led by Juan Cornejo, a local representative of the Teamsters Union at the Del Monte cannery in Crystal City, and thePolitical Association of Spanish-speaking Organizations. PASSO succeeded in getting more Mexican Americans to pay the poll tax and vote. In addition, the Mexican Texans organized the large migrant farm-labor pool affiliated with the Teamsters at Del Monte. The Hispanics selected a slate of five candidates, who became known as los cinco, from among the poor and undereducated Mexican Texans, to run for the city council. The group faced intimidation by the political establishment. Several workers at the Del Monte plant were fired for wearing campaign buttons, for instance; but Teamsters officials intervened, and their jobs were reinstated. Texas Rangersqv were called in, reportedly to provide protection for the Mexican Americans. Agricultural leaders doubled hourly pay for their workers, and Del Monte went into overtime production to keep workers from voting. Los cinco, however, gained widespread support, and all five candidates defeated the five incumbents in a close election.

The newly elected all-Mexican-American city council and the succeeding administration had trouble governing the city because of political factions among the new officials. Cornejo was selected mayor from among the five new council members, but eventually his apparent quest for total control of city government led to his loss of support. A new group made up of both Caucasians and middle-class Mexican Americans, the Citizens Association Serving All Americans, announced its plans to run candidates for countywide offices in 1964, with the goal of ousting politicians that it considered dominated by “outside interests,” an allusion to the roles of PASSO and the Teamsters in the elections of 1963. CASAA won the constable and commissioner seats and ran three Mexican-American and two Caucasian candidates in the city council election in 1965. The Hispanic activists did not repeat their poll-tax drive to bolster their voting bloc, and CASAA won.

In 1967 the Mexican American Youth Organization was founded by three Chicanos, including José Ángel Gutiérrez at Crystal City High School. In 1969, after a conflict about the ethnicity of cheerleaders, the school compromised to establish a cheerleading squad of three Caucasian and three Mexican-American girls. But in June the school board invalidated the compromise. The following November 100 Mexican-American students and their parents took a long list of grievances to the school board. In December 1969, when the board denied the charges of discrimination and refused to act on them, 200 Mexican-American students went out on strike, with their parents’ support. The boycott soon extended to both the middle and elementary schools. The United States Department of Justice sent a team to intervene in the crisis, probably in response to the visit by three striking students to its Washington headquarters. The federal officials negotiated a settlement that obliged the board to meet most of the students’ demands, including bilingual, bicultural education, better testing programs, and more cultural celebrations. The following January the Raza Unida Party, which was founded almost immediately after the successful student boycott, received enough votes to win seats on the school board and the city council.

BIBLIOGRAPHY: John Staples Shockley, Chicano Revolt in a Texas Town (Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 1974).

Teresa Palomo Acosta

Marfa: Modernist Art, Detention Centers, and the Erasure of Detention History

Wednesday, January 13th, 2010
Chinati Art Museum Building in Marfa, Texas, formerly part of a WWII prison camp.  Photography by Margaret E. Dorsey

Chinati Art Museum Building in Marfa, Texas, formerly part of a WWII prison camp. Photography by Margaret E. Dorsey

On a recent trip to Marfa, Texas we took a tour of the Chinati Foundation’s permanent exhibit of Donald Judd’s untitled works in milled aluminum.  Judd installed the project in 1978-1979 in what has been called, depending on the source, artillery sheds, airplane hangars, and what our tour guide termed work centers for “Germans.”  We later learned that the facility housed German soldiers captured during World War II.  We see Judd’s artistic vision was modernist (indeed minimalist) at a couple of levels.  First, the permanent installation of milled aluminum pieces and concrete structures do engage universal notions of finding order and symmetry in life and art.  Second, the artistic vision derives from an avante-garde notion of the artist and his work standing beyond history, even though inspired by his own artistic impulses.

Indeed, Judd’s motivation was to create permanence in art, and his need to create a “unified aesthetic entity of works and space,” that would be in a place in perpetuity, determined his vision  (see http://www.chinati.org/pdf/making2works.pdf).   The milled aluminum structures are impressive.  The precision of the cubes shatters the roughness of the shed yet seem to frame the landscape through their optical variance.

Judd Untitled Work in Milled Aluminum, photograph by Miguel Diaz-Barriga

Judd Untitled Work in Milled Aluminum, photograph by Miguel Diaz-Barriga

The facility where Judd's milled aluminum pieces are exhibited.

The facility where Judd's milled aluminum pieces are exhibited, photography by Margaret Dorsey.

Our tour of  the grounds was both enlightening and frustrating, particularly the elision of the heavy militarization of the Marfa area historically  and the site of Judd’s work more specifically.  Clearly , the vision of Donald Judd and the Chinati Foundation is not to engage the context of the art in a town, Marfa, and a site, Camp Marfa later Fort D.A. Russell whose primary role was military.  In the early twentieth century, Camp Marfa housed a cavalry batallion to guard against the “spread” of the Mexican Revolution into Texas.  Later it housed chemical batallions, Women Army Corps, and an army airbase.  During WWII, the facility was a large prisoner of war camp for captured Germans.

Modernist art is indeed known for flattening–and even erasing–history.  We do not think Judd’s art itself needs to take this history into account.  However, during the tours of the facility, in order to fully appreciate the impact of Judd’s work on the landscape and buildings, this history should be taken into fuller account. Indeed, when entering the facility one has to pass a border patrol station and throughout Marfa buses from Wackenhut are evident.  (Wackenhut is the bus company that DHS contracted to transport undocumented immigrants to detention centers.) We even had coffee in Marfa with a truck driver transporting pylons for border wall construction.    The history of detention in Marfa continues. We can appreciate Judd’s work and understand the history of detaining and transporting “enemy aliens” in West Texas.

Wackenhut bus for transporting undocumented immigrants to detention centers.

Wackenhut bus parked in Marfa. These buses transport undocumented immigrants to detention centers, photograph by Miguel Diaz-Barriga.

Borderwall Art: Scott Nicol

Sunday, January 3rd, 2010

Scott Nicol, a Professor of Art at South Texas College and a founder of the No Border Wall group (http://notexasborderwall.com/) , is one of the most knowledgeable critics of the border wall.  We (Miguel and Scott)  recently went to photograph the border wall near the town of Progreso Lakes, a tiny town of roughly 250 that surrounds two small lakes.  The town is located near the Progreso Bridge.  Behind the border wall, on the southern side, are conservation areas managed by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services.  We passed through one of the gaps in the wall to take pictures of the area.  We were almost immediately approached by border patrol agents who asked what we were doing in the area.  Indeed, it is ambiguous whether or not we were permitted to be on the south side of the wall even though we are technically still on U.S. soil.  While the border patrol agents were professional, asking why we were taking photographs, etc., the ambiguity of access to the southern side of the wall was disconcerting. (On a side note:  Margaret and Miguel have been stopped from crossing through gaps because, border patrol agents told us, we were entering private property.  We only put up a mild argument that we were on county roads.)

Scott Nicol took the following photographs of the wall at Progreso Lakes.

Border Patrol Observes Scott Nichol and Miguel Diaz-Barriga

Border Patrol Observes Scott Nicol and Miguel Diaz-Barriga

The Border Wall at Progreso Lakes is a combination concrete and metal pylon structure.

The Border Wall at Progreso Lakes is a combination concrete and metal pylon structure.

When we drove further back into the conservation area we came across an inner-tube that was tangled in a tree.  Scott has used inner-tubes in some of his art/activist pieces.  I shot the following photograph of Scott taking down the inner-tube.

Scott has incorporated found materials into his more activist based art on the border wall and immigration.

Scott has incorporated found materials into his more activist based art on the border wall and immigration.

In one of Scott Nicol’s more activist works he used an inner-tube that he found along the Rio Grande River, apparently used by an undocumented immigrant to come into the United States, to comment on U.S. border policy.  Scott was kind enough to provide a photograph of this piece which has been displayed at a Brownsville art gallery.

Scott Nicol - Terrorists and Terrorist Weapons

Why are we not talking about citizenship?

Thursday, November 5th, 2009
An editorial about border security, published by the New York Times on September 21, 2009, emphasizes the high cost of the border wall and the lack of ways to evaluate its effectiveness. The editorial rightly calls for broader immigration reform. In a reply that we wrote to the editorial, that was not published, we noted that there is a higher price that should be emphasized—the denial of citizenship.? We include our response and the original editorial below.Any comments?
Border Fantasies rightly criticizes the cost of building the border wall and lack of oversight. As anthropologists studying border wall construction, citizens of South Texas shocked us when they explained that the United States government ignored over 30 laws to expedite construction, ranging from environmental laws to historic preservation laws. Our research demonstrates that these waivers severely limit the ability of local citizens, landowners and politicians–including border city mayors–to challenge fence construction. For many Texans, DHS??s circumvention of established laws created an atmosphere of distrust and extreme frustration. In effect, Congress and DHS stripped Texans of their legal rights. Congress needs to look at the costs associated with the border wall, both fiscally and as an affront to our democracy.”

BORDER FANTASIES

Members of Congress who voted for the Southwest border fence as the fix for illegal immigration professed shock? shock at the news that the project is running years behind, and billions of dollars ahead, of the Bush administrations early, rosy projections.

Auditors reported last week that the high-tech, 28-mile virtual section of the fence was running a mere seven years behind this months planned opening. Initially, designers talked of using off-the-shelf technology for the radar, cameras and other sensors, but problems cropped up. (Imagine, discovering that cameras tremble in rough weather.) I am trying to figure out why this is so difficult, said Representative Michael McCaul of Texas. ??These are basically cameras on a pole.??

The current cost estimate for the Buck Rogers barrier? $1.1 billion.

Investigators from the nonpartisan Government Accountability Office report that the larger, actual fence covering a 600 mile-plus stretch between San Diego and Brownsville, Tex. cost $2.4 billion to build and will cost an extra $6.5 billion in upkeep across two decades.

Investigators also concluded that theres no good way of gauging the effectiveness of the fence.

The current decline in border arrests could be because of the bad economy as much as the fence (which the innovative have already learned to breach with cutters, torches and ladders). Even then, the fence covers only the more manageable third of the border with Mexico.

Members of the House border security subcommittee voiced grave concern but did not peer much beyond fencing technology to the more complex reality: the need for Congress to reform the nations immigration laws. No fence can keep a determined immigrant out or absolve Congress of that responsibility.

The Texas Rangers on the Border

Wednesday, November 4th, 2009

Americo Paredes, writing about the Texas Rangers in the early 1900s, describes them as a force whose main goal was to create terror among border residents. Now, with Governor Perry sending a special tactical unit of Texas Rangers to secure the U.S. Mexico Border this historical memory of the rangers (or rinches) is now bringing back memories of this violence.

Consider the following post in the blog South Texas Chisme (http://stxc.blogspot.com/2009_09_01_archive.html):

“They seem to be speaking to the Anglo populace, because they sure are not speaking to me. Am I supposed to be thrilled that Perry is bringing Los Rinches back? They just don’t get it, do they? Now comes PERRY – an Anglo – to remind us Mexicans/Chicanos that the killer Texas Rangers are still alive and well. Known by Mexicans as Los Rinches de Tejas ? these foul-mouthed lawmen too often took the law into their own hands and lynched Mexicans simply because they were there and because they were defenseless.

By some estimates, thousands of Mexicans were lynched by Los Rinches who, in their brutality, executed them without suffering any repercussions from Texas courts. Los Rinches would falsely arrest Mexicans and would promptly lynch them, without benefit of a court trial or any other venue where the person’s guilt or innocence could be proved.

In the period from 1848 to 1870, some official records show that 473 out of every 100,000 Mexican migrant workers died at the hands of Los Rinches. In the 1850s, Tejanos faced expulsion from their Central Texas homes on the accusation that they helped slaves escape to Mexico. Others became victims of Anglo wrath around the Goliad area during the Cart War of 1857, as they did in South Texas in 1859 after Juan N. Cortinas’ capture of Brownsville.”

Our question is to what extent does this quote capture the views and sentiments of border residents. Any ideas?

imgres.jpg

THE BORDER WALL AND HUMAN RIGHTS

Wednesday, October 29th, 2008

An inter-disciplinary group of professors and students from the Rappaport Center for Human Rights and Justice at The University of Texas at Austin argued before the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) that the border wall violates the human rights of border residents. Luz Patricia Mejia (Venezuela), Vice-President of IACHR, moderated the session, granting twenty minutes to the Working Group, twenty minutes to U.S. government representatives, and twenty minutes for questions and answers. This meant that all of the presentations were concise– though backed with full legal briefs and documentation. Indeed, the IACH had a full agenda, including ten hearings on a variety of topics in two rooms on October 22 alone.

The IACHR, along with the Inter-American Court on Human Rights, are independent wings of the Organization of American States charged with protecting human rights in the Americas. The mandate of the IACHR is founded on the American Convention on Human Rights that has been ratified by 25 countries in the Americas. (The United States did not ratify it.) The United States, however, does participate in the IACHR, but our nation is not bound by the ruling of the Inter-American Court. Thus, while the IACHR might find that the border wall violates human rights it is not clear that this ruling will impact US policy.

Denise Gilman, a professor at the University of Texas Law Clinic, outlined the human rights that the border wall violates:

–Private property
–Culture
–Equal Protection
–Indigenous Rights
–Rights to Freedom of Expression and Investigation

Jeff Wilson, Assistant Professor of Environmental Sciences at the University of Texas-Brownsville, presented demographic data to demonstrate that the border wall disproportionately impact marginalized populations. Margo Tamez, a writer and Lipan Apache activist whose family owns land that will be bisected by the border wall, movingly introduced her testimony in Lipan Apache and spoke eloquently on how the border wall violates indigenous rights.

The fact that opponents of the border wall testified before the IACHR demonstrates the lack of consultation and openness in negotiations with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). According to their guidelines, all “means of remedying the situation domestically” must be exhausted before the IACHR will hear a case.

In her presentation, Denise Gilman summarized various failed attempts by elected officials, local landowners, citizens, and activist groups to negotiate with DHS.

As a publicity event, the IACHR hearing on the border wall garnered minimal coverage. A Lexus-Nexus search generated a handful of citations on the IACHR hearings. Beyond raising a small amount of publicity, the hearings–especially if the IACHR finds that the border wall violates human rights–will enrich debate about immigration issues. Melissa del Bosque, a reporter for the Texas Observer, explains:

While the commission may not force a change in Homeland Security’s policies toward the border wall and immigration detainee rights, Gilman hopes it can enrich the immigration debate in the United States.
“They bring a unique perspective and look at immigration and the border wall issues from a rule of law and compliance with international norms on human rights,” she says.

Ultimately, Gilman hopes that during an increasingly negative election season in which immigration reform has so far not been a major issue, the Commission can help inform candidates about immigration and human rights concerns. “I’m hopeful that this might help frame the issue for the next presidential administration.”

http://www.texasobserver.org/blog/index.php/author/delbosque/

Posted October 28, 200

MDB/MED

What Happened to Immigration?

Monday, October 27th, 2008

In the last few months, immigration reform seems to have disappeared as a campaign issue at the national level. At the local and regional level, however, including South Texas, the issue is still alive. A cottage industry has emerged in the media to explain why and how immigration has disappeared as an issue in the national campaigns. Among the reasons are the obvious:

1. John McCain, known as Amnesty Juan by conservative critics, supported comprehensive immigration reform. Once McCain won the primary it became a strategicquestion not to make immigration a wedge issue. Likewise, for Barack Obama, emphasizing comprehensive immigration reform would have cost him support since Democrats are not united on the issue of immigration reform. For both candidates, then, deemphasizing immigration is a well-reasoned campaign tactic (see Diaz-Barriga and Dorsey, Senator Barack Obama and Immigration Reform, Journal of Black Studies, 38(1), 90-104, 2007).
2. In playing to the Latino/a vote, both candidates in their Spanish campaign ads emphasize their support for comprehensive immigration reform. In one ad John McCain blames Barack Obama (falsely) for undermining comprehensive immigration reform (see http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WmcbiL8XtbQ). These ads air in battleground states with large Latino/a populations. However, they are not playing in Texas, even though the state has a large Mexican American population. As far as we can tell, English versions of these ads do not exist.
3. The souring of the economy, including coverage of the bailout, consumes both the campaigns and the press. The national press, according to Pew, did not cover immigration that much in 2007. It is not surprising, then, that as candidates stopped talking about immigration the press did not follow-up on it (see http://www.journalism.org/print/8805).

While these reasons for the lack of attention in the national campaigns are in need of further analysis the spin that this lack has generated is perhaps more interesting. For example, in an article posted in the on-line edition of the Wall Street Journal, columnist Jason L. Riley argues that conservatives should keep the immigrants out and focus on deporting the multiculturalists:

“If American culture is under assault today, it’s not from immigrants who aren’t assimilating but from liberal elites who reject the concept of assimilation. For multiculturalists, and particularly those in the academy, assimilation is a dirty word. A values-neutral belief system is embraced by some to avoid having to judge one culture as superior or inferior to another. Others reject the assimilationist paradigm outright on the grounds that the U.S. hasn’t always lived up to its ideals. America slaughtered Indians and enslaved blacks, goes the argument, and this wicked history means we have no right to impose a value system on others.” (http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121080967841993539.html?mod=opinion_main_commentaries)

Riley points out that Americans are rightly ambivalent about immigration since migrants do assimilate despite the best efforts of leftist elitists. For an anthropologists response to journalists that mischaracterize us as espousing a “values-neutral belief system,” see Sally Engle Merry, Human Rights Law and the Demonization of Culture (And Anthropology Along the Way), PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review, May 2003, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 55-76

More on this in future blogs!

mdb/med